幾款PHP框架性能對比（Zend、CakePHP、Yii等）

---

案例

本次測試輸出簡單的hello word，簡單MVC邏輯，(Router -> Controller -> Viewer)，沒有數據庫連接，沒有任何邏輯.

硬件平臺

• CPU: Intel Core i5 750 (2.67GHz x4)
• RAM: 4GB

軟件環境

Debian 6.0.4 x86_64 (2.6.32-41)

apache 2.2.16 (mpm-prefork,mod-php5)

php 5.3.10

php-apc 3.1.9 (Optimization for include/require)

Copy all projects to /dev/shm/* (Optimization for files read/write)

PHP框架列表

* zf: Zend Framework

Site: 

Ver: 1.11.11

* zf2: Zend Framework

Site: 

Site: 

Ver: 2.0.0-beta1

* symfony: symfony
Site: 
Ver: 2.0.0

* cakephp: CakePHP

Site: 

Ver: 2.0.4

* ci: CodeIgniter

Site: 

Ver: 2.1.0

* yii: Yii Framework

Site: 

Ver: 1.1.8

* micromvc4: MicroMVC

Site: 

Ver: 4.0.0

* laravel: Laravel, A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

Site: 

Ver: 2.0.2

* slim: Slim Framework

Site: 

Ver: 1.5.0

* yaf: Yet Another Framework in PHP Extension

Site: 

Ver: 2.1.3-beta (yaf.cache_config=1)

* FuelPHP: Simple, Flexible, Community driven Web Framework

Site: 

Ver: 1.1

* ColaPHP:

Site: 

Ver: 1.2-ga

# XHProf: A Hierarchical Profiler for PHP

Site: 

Ver: 0.9.2

# The source code of this testing:

Source: 

1. Apache Benchmark

Requests pre second (-c 100 -n 30000), the bigger is better

請求/秒(-c 200 -n 50000), 數值越大越好

2. 系統負載

壓力測試一分鐘內完成的負載圖

越小越好(-c 100 -n 30000)

3. 內存使用率

測試hello word占用的內存，越小越好.

4. 響應時間

頁面的響應時間.單位微妙

5. 調用方法的數量(Facebook XHProf)

單個hello word頁面調用了多少方法，zend5620個方法，是不是太臃腫了。

6. 文件數量

打開hellow word用到included or required in 文件的數量.越小越好,zend很多,yii19個，yaf才4個，不快才怪。